|
Date: 6th May 2010
Can Intel's Moorestown take on ARM's town
of processors?
Intel for long time was going in a direction planned by
one of its genius founder Gordon Moore. It successfully
increased the number of transistors with in square micrometer
as per the estimate thought by Gordon Moore. The benefits
of low power and speed were inherent when the size of the
transistor goes down. All these benefits were so significant,
Intel has not given priority to improve the processor architecture
like the way it has improved semiconductor chip integration
abilities. In fact Intel has also achieved super successes
in identifying dielectric materials and improving silicon
properties to perform at higher speeds reliably.
All this achievements clearly need Einstein type of thinking,
but at the core, they are more about physics and optics
rather than digital electronics. It's not just Intel many
other semiconductor vendors followed this trend. One company
quietly and successfully worked on connecting transistors
and logic gates differently to achieve optimum use of transistors
and logic gates to perform a logic or arithmetic function.
That company is ARM, whose processor cores can be found
more or less in every house having some digital portable
gadget.
It's not that Intel has not worked in reducing power-consumption,
it has not worked the electronics way much but has worked
in the material physics. In fact it is tough to achieve
low power consumption through materials, The strategy of
Intel looks to be give the competitors tough time in emulating
the material research what Intel has achieved.
But the market don't care for whether its smart processor
or smart material. It cares for what good for the customer.
The smartphones giving performance close to earlier version
of Intel's Pentium chips but with the battery of less than
5 Watt Hour capacity need smart processors. ARM processor
based chips delivered that without a fan over its head.
But there is still enough opportunity for Intel to gain
market share in portable electronic devices. It takes less
time for Intel to build smart processors. It can combine
its manufacturing expertise with its processor design architecture
abilites to deliver new chips for portables. That's the
newly launched Atom processor-based SoC chip with on-chip
analog and mixed-signal. Earlier Intel has named this as
Moorestown. Click
here to know more on this Intel's new chip.
Here the differentiators for Intel are software partners.
If Microsoft can deliver windows7 type mobile OS for smartphones
which only works on Intel chips. That's huge advantage for
Intel. But this partnership has a threat from Android and
Google's OS.
Its no different for ARM, ARM can only strengthen it's
competitiveness by partnering with companies like Apple,
GlobalFoundries, Google, SoC chip vendors and any such companies.
Between these two, does MIPS or any such processor expert
has opportunity? To little extent, the answer is 'yes' provided
MIPS chips deliver multicore performance and also supported
by OEM and Software partners.
Finally, it's all about partnership.
|