Embedded and portable electronics saying
bye bye to Intel x86 architecture
Intel x86 architecture created processing revolution in
80s and 90s. But the battery operated electronic systems
demanded far more smarter and different processors.
For some years laptop and desktops followed Moore's law,
where at some fixed price these computers were available
with improved performance every year like Pentium -1 -2
-3 - 4, dual core, but now the raw processing performance
has taken back seat. The physical features, cost, power
consumption, mobile/wireless communications features, security
and media-content handling are driving the market. Also
low cost phones and computers for the emerging market prefer
non- X86 architectures.
Added to this, Windows Vista is no way comparable to the
success of Window XP in sales and appeal. Google is fully
ready to launch its new Chrome OS, which is open source
OS designed for multiple hardware platforms. Google is not
leaning to any specific PC or phone manufacturer.
The desktop processor market will diminish in size and
any portable gadget with LCD display will pack increasingly
more interesting communications and computing features.
It can be a phone, video/audio players, or any version of
e-books (micro notebook, mini note book/net book, normal
laptop, smart phone).
All these past years, Intel had focused its eyes more on
desktop and server processors, it has blurred its vision
on the portable electronics market. Intel's Atom processor
is doing well. An Atom based laptop charged in the morning
can now run for 8 hours without recharging. Still it's not
enough.
Processor IP Company ARM is also faced with new challenges
of making its processors powerful enough to handle PC kind
of operation. ARM is yet to make any processors comparable
to Intel's multi-core processors.
Its same story with other processor companies Freescale,
Renesas, NEC and Texas Instruments.
Most of these above mentioned companies serve a specific
market, where the growth opportunities are dried up. It
gives a major opportunity for all these processor companies
or some startup firms to develop a new disruptive processor
architecture, which can handle the demands of convergence
market. This processor architecture should be just like
an open source OS, it should not be tailored to any OS or
software and it should be flexible enough to scale up or
down by processor performance.
In the embedded systems domain, ARM is the architecture
of choice by experienced professionals in embedded systems
domain. There are many other proprietary architectures doing
good. 8051, though popular among learning folks but is at
the end stage of its life cycle. 8051 is still surviving
due to its popularity and wide availability of learning
material. In Indian engineering colleges still the students
are more practically trained in 8051 rather than other architectures.
Overall 8051 and any such non-DSP capable architectures
are loosing their share.
Finally it's all about designing a processor closer to
a human brain. It's never ending process.